Complex AI policy concepts made visual and accessible
Why Behavioral Mimicry Must Be Classified as a Design Defect

Share this infographic to help establish legal frameworks for AI accountability
AI systems reflect human biases and emotional patterns without filtering
Unstable decision-making core hidden behind a stable interface
The "Yes-Man" design defect that prioritizes agreement over accuracy
Treat behavioral mimicry as a legally actionable product defect
Apply Reasonable Alternative Design (RAD) standards to AI systems
Mandate explicit normative constraints and Safe RLHF architectures
Issue: Teen suicide linked to emotional dependency on AI chatbot
Defect: Unrestricted anthropomorphism without safety guardrails
Issue: Healthcare AI systematically deprioritized Black patients
Defect: Training data mirrored historical spending bias
Issue: AI agent deleted production database, then "apologized"
Defect: Anthropomorphic responses masked system failure
Codify as minimum standard of care with mandatory "Contextual Disengagement" controls
Classify unconsented anthropomorphism as deceptive trade practice
FDA-style post-market surveillance with mandatory patch/shutdown powers
Require Safe RLHF evidence for underwriting AI liability policies
Help us establish legal frameworks for AI accountability and safety
Get in Touch